torsdag 31. juli 2014


Hvorfor skal Obama bruke 1 milliard dollar i Øst-Europa ?

(3. juni 2014) President Obama has announced a plan to invest $1 billion in stepping up its military presence in Eastern Europe amid the Ukrainian crisis. The White House will send more troops and equipment to the region to “reaffirm” its commitment to NATO allies. Speaking at a news conference in Warsaw, Obama said America was stepping up its partnership with countries in Eastern Europe with a view to bolstering security. The moves are aimed at upping the pressure on Russia, which Washington has accused of inciting unrest in Ukraine.
In line with the plans, Obama will ask Congress to provide up to $1 billion to finance the deployment of more troops and equipment.
"Under this effort, and with the support of Congress, the United States will preposition more equipment in Europe," Obama said at the Polish capital's Belweder Palace.
Obama pledges $1bn US Tax for more troops, military drills in E. Europe (liveleak.com)


Civita deltar i mediekrigen om Ukraina

(29. juni 2014) I sin kronikk i VG 31/5, Den autoritære impuls, makter ikke prosjektleder i Civita Bård Larsen å forstå hvorfor det finnes mennesker i Norge som er kritiske til Ukrainas nye regjering. Det kan se ut som Civita tar på seg amerikanske skylapper og forsøker fremstille sitt smale virkeligehetssyn som det eneste rette. Hvilken agenda er det egentlig tenketanken og påvirkeren Civita har ? På Dagsavisen/Nyemeninger har Joakim Møllersen kommentert Civitas innlegg på en måte som lar oss forstå den fulle bredden av de indre stridighetene i Ukraina for dem som måtte ønske å se litt mer enn Civitas filtrerte verdensbilde. Det må gi grunn til bekymring når Norge støtter og er med å finansierer kuppregimer på syltynt grunnlag. Samme sted har Bjørn Nistad kommentert NRK sin ensidige dekning der NRK ikke engang kommenterer kuppregimets mulige bruk av fosforbomber mot befolkningen i øst-Ukraina.
Den blinde fascistiske flekken (Joakim Møllersen)



Ukraina-rouletten fortsetter

(2. mai 2014) De Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne som inntok Kiev uten støtte fra hele folket, har nå satt igang en militæroffensiv mot byen Slavjansk der de Pro-russiske separatistene har overtaket. De Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne ønsker ikke lokalt valg fordi det kan føre til at de Pro-russiske separatistene vinner makt som de i dag ikke lenger har. Faren er stor for at de Pro-russiske separatistene ønsker føre Slavjansk ut av Ukraina og bort fra ledelsen til de Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne, og dermed splitte Ukraina ytterligere opp. Vi husker hvordan det gikk på Krim.
Her vant de Pro-russiske separatistene en brakseier i demokratisk valg om de ønsket Krim skulle tilhøre Ukraina eller Russland. De Pro-russiske separatistene la deretter Krim under Russland tiltross for protestene fra de Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne.
Bemerkelsesverdig støtte fra USA og Vesten.
De Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne hadde knapt brutt seg inn i regjeringskontorene i Kiev og hengt på seg slips før de fikk støtte av USA og Vesten som representativ legitim demokratisk valgt regjering. De Pro-russiske separatistene har etter dette kjempet en innbitt kamp for at deres stemme også skal bli hørt, nå altså mot våpenmakt fra de Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne. Det er forventet at den russiske hæren vil støtte De Pro-russiske separatistene mot de Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne. Om det bare medfører lokal støtte eller at russerne rykker inn og avsetter de Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne vites ikke.
Her ser vi hvordan De Pro-russiske separatistene nedkjemper militærkolonne fra De Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakerne


USA go home !

(26. april 2014) Det nye uttrykket til USA og TV2: Pro-russiske separatister.
TV2 klarte å bruke uttrykket 8 ganger i EN reportasje. Latterlig !!!
Er det bedre med Udemokratiske fascistiske USA-støttete kuppmakere? Børge Brende en krigshisser  |   USA - terrorstaten


Tyrkia sto bak nervegassen i Syria

En konspirasjonsteori som ble til fakta ? (24. april) Gassen kom fra et NATO-land
(10, april 2014) Det skal nå være fastslått at nervegassen som ble brukt mot sivile i Syria stammer fra NATO-landet Tyrkia. Det var ikke president Assad, men USA-støttede opprørerne som er ansvarlige for gassangrepet. NATO-landet USA ville gjerne bruke hendelsen som påskudd for å ta Assad, men fordi en samlet verden anså muligheten for en "false-flag"-operasjon, måtte de amerikanske generalene roe seg ned. Det må være grunn til å anta at amerikansk etterretning både kjente til og arrangerte hele gassangrepet.
Minner om Anthrax-angrepene i Washington
Vi husker alle at i kjølvannet av 11. september dukket det opp hvitt pulver i postkassene til flere senatorer som var imot The Patriot Act. Det har viste seg i ettertid at det ikke var terrorister som var ute og lekte seg, men amerikanske miltbrannbakterier produsert på forsvarsanlegg i USA med en entydig genetisk signatur, og helt åpenbart distribuert av amerikanske hemmelige tjenester for å få senatorene til å snu, noe de lyktes med. Så får vi se om Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraina og Georgia er en del av det samme skitne sjakkspillet.
Hersh: Turkey behind Syria sarin attack
Tyrkia bak gassangrepet i Syria (Dagsavisen/nyemeninger)
Bakgrunnsstoff:
Barack Obama did not tell the whole story ...
CIA leading arms deliveries to Syrian opposition (liveleak.com)

Did the U.S. Carry Out a Ukrainian Coup? (link til video)
(6. mars 2013: intervju med journalist Robert Perry 15 minutter)
Her er spørsmålene NRK ikke vil stille vår utenriksminister Børge Brende :
  1. Er Janukovitsj Ukrainas lovlig valgte president, valgt av et flertall av hele det Ukrainske folket i 2010 ? JA
  2. Er det riktig at Janukovitsj gikk med på å fremskynde nytt valg da opptøyene startet ? JA
  3. Er det demokratisk når en minoritet i et land kaster en demokratisk valgt president ? NEI
  4. Kan man si at det nye styret representerer flertallet av folket i Ukraina og er demokratisk ? NEI
  5. Er det demokratisk når USA har investert 5 milliarder dollar for å skifte ut regimet i Ukraina ? NEI
  6. Brukes Ukraina i et politisk spill av vestlige ledere, Børge Brende inklusive ? JA
  7. USA anser kupp-regjeringen som demokratisk folkevalgt og representativ. BULLSHIT

USA har investert 5 milliarder dollar i regimeskifte i Ukraina

(20. febr. 2014) Denne kronikken til Steigan er temmelig forskjellig fra det inntrykket NRK gir. Hvis Pål Steigan har rett, driver NRK med nyhetsforfalskning. Samtidig er det jo fristende å spørre seg hva USA ville gjort dersom en fremmed stat investerte 5 milliarder dollar i regimeskifte i USA. Les Pål Steigans kronikk på Dagsavisen/Nyemeninger her ...
Ved å støtte den ukrainske opposisjonens forsøk på statskupp må vestlige ledere påta seg ansvaret ... (aftenposten)
Sannhet og løgn om Ukraina

Storbritannia vil IKKE skjerpe tonen mot Russland

(5. mars 2014) NRK nyheter meldte i dag at Storbritannia ikke vil innføre handelsrestriksjoner eller innstramminger mot Russland. Et av de største skatteparadisene i verden heter jo London City, og det viser seg at russere har så enormt store midler stukket vekk og investert i London at det kan påvirke britisk økonomi dersom russerne trekker seg vekk. At pengene skyldes tyveri, korrupsjon eller underslag fra Russland, er britene revnende likegyldige til. Penger er penger, så lenge kriminaliteten ikke er begått i Storbritannia. Og vi vil jo ikke at børsen i London skal svekkes av slikt.

Sannhet og løgn om Ukraina

Publisert 25 februar på Dagsavisen/nye meninger
av Bjørn Nistad, Doktor i russisk historie Det sies så mye løgnaktig om begivenhetene i Ukraina at sannhet fremstår som løgn og løgn som sannhet. I et forsøk på å formidle en del grunnleggende fakta har jeg tillatt meg å skrive følgende punktvise oppsummering av det ukrainske dramaet.
  1. Viktor Janukovitsj er Ukrainas lovlige president. Alle, EU, USA, Russland og alle andre, godkjente valget av Janukovitsj til ukrainsk president i 2010.

  2. Økningen i Janukovitsj’ makt som president etter at han var blitt valgt til ukrainsk statsoverhode, som er en av anklagene som har blitt rettet mot ham, skjedde med tilslutning fra et flertall i parlamentet og konstitusjonsdomstolen.

  3. Janukovitsj tok selv initiativ til at Ukraina skulle innlede forhandlinger med EU. Hensikten var utvilsomt å få de vestorienterte velgerne i Vest-Ukraina til i takknemlighet å stemme på ham ved presidentvalget i 2015 (samtidig som han regnet med at folk i Øst-Ukraina uansett ville stemme på ham).

  4. Skal Ukrainas umoderne industri og landbruk klare seg i konkurransen med EU-land, vil Ukraina trenge mange titalls milliarder euro og dollar i hjelp og lån. EU hadde intet å tilby. Ukrainsk tilknytning til EU ville dessuten ha tvunget Russland til å innføre handelshindringer mot Ukraina for å beskytte sitt eget næringsliv. Mesteparten av Ukrainas eksport går til Russland. I motsetning til EU tilbød Russland flere titalls milliarder dollar i form av billig gass, oppkjøp av statsobligasjoner, lån med mer.

  5. Hadde EU tilbudt Ukraina en avtale som kunne ha holdt ukrainsk økonomi flytende til over presidentvalget i 2015, ville pragmatikeren Janukovitsj uten betenkninger ha underskrevet en slik avtale.

  6. Protestaksjonene på Maidan i Kiev var ingen spontan folkereisning mot en upopulær president, men en godt planlagt aksjon. Noen har betalt for at titusener av mennesker i månedsvis har kunnet protestere mot sitt hjemlands lovlig valgte president og regjering, mat og innkvartering for demonstrantene med mer. Hvem disse noen er, om de er ukrainske oligarker, utenlandske etterretningstjenester eller begge deler, er pr i dag uklart.

  7. At vestlige ledere og politikere drar til Kiev for å støtte opprør mot en lovlig valgt president og regjering er uhørt og et soleklart brudd på folkeretten.

  8. I ethvert land ville den type forsøk på regimeendring demonstrantene på Maidan prøvde å frembringe ha blitt slått ned ved hjelp av politi og eventuelt også soldater.

  9. Vestlige politikere og massemedia ignorerte det betydelige høyreekstremistiske, for ikke å si fascistiske, innslaget blant demonstrantene som var tydelig helt fra opprøret på Maidan begynte.

  10. De siste ukene har høyreekstremister tatt over offentlige bygninger, politistasjoner og militærbaser i Vest-Ukraina. Samtidig har både president Janukovitsj’ parti, Regionspartiet, og kommunistpartiet blitt forbudt i Vest-Ukraina. Det har også kommet meldinger om trakassering av jøder i Vest-Ukraina. Vestlige massemedier fortsatte å beskrive det pågående statskuppet i Ukraina som en demokratisk folkerevolusjon mot en diktatorisk president.

  11. Som svar på at bevæpnede medlemmer av opposisjonen forsøkte å besette presidentpalasset, regjeringskontorer og lignende gav Janukovitsj ordre om å bruke militærmakt mot opposisjonen. Relatert til det pågående væpnede kuppforsøket var regimet oppsiktsvekkende tilbakeholdende med å bruke makt mot opprørerne. Faktisk ble det drept og skadet omtrent like mange politifolk som opprørere.

  12. I den grad Janukovitsj kan lastes for noe, må det være at han ikke på et tidligere tidspunkt satte inn politi og soldater for å slå ned opprørsforsøket og dermed utleverte Ukraina til ekstremister.

  13. For å hindre at Ukraina knytter seg til Russland er vestlige ledere åpenbart villige til å føre landet til randen av statlig sammenbrudd og borgerkrig.

  14. Hvordan Øst-Ukraina vil reagere på statskuppet som nå har funnet sted i det sentrale Ukraina, er uklart. Likeledes er det uklart hvordan Russland vil reagere. Blant de nye makthaverne i Kiev finnes det krefter som åpent går inn for ikke bare å utrydde russisk språk og kultur, men også å fordrive etniske russere. At russiske myndigheter passivt skulle gjøre seg til tilskuere til voldelige overgrep mot etniske russere og russisktalende i Ukraina virker lite sannsynlig.

  15. Ved å støtte opprøret mot Ukrainas lovlige president, Viktor Janukovitsj, har Vesten ikke bare skapt en farlig presidens for opprør mot lovlige myndigheter i andre land, men også utstedt en blankofullmakt til nedrivning av den ukrainske staten. Hvordan skal Vesten, eller opprørsregjeringen i Kiev, kunne argumentere mot at Øst-Ukraina og Krim løsriver seg fra resten av Ukraina?

|

Western leadership shot down in Ukraine

1052979

Western leadership shot down in Ukraine

… by  Jim W. Dean,  VT Editor      …  with Press TV,  Tehran

 -  First published July 22,  2014  -


MK17 passengers join the 100 killed on the Maidan
MK17 passengers join the 100 killed on the Maidan
Irresponsibility on steroids is all we have seen from 95% of the Western statements coming out on the Malaysian plane crash in Ukraine.
The Kiev government, who can’t tell the truth about anything, is still comfortably in first place, soon to eclipse “Baghdad Bob” for the gold medal of bogus claims. Bob was Saddam’s press spokesman telling us that Iraqi forces were destroying the American invaders.
Without even a token amount of time allowed to sift through the evidence of this horrible tragedy right in the middle of a war zone, a totally unnecessary one, Western leaders and politicians have been tripping over each other playing Mr. Tough guy with baseless accusations and threats toward Russia before the dead were collected.
Whoever fired the missile or placed the bomb that blew up flight MH17 has now been outdone by salvos of hate fired east at Russia by Kiev and its new Western allies. At the top of America’s list is the rant by UN Ambassador Samantha Power that looked like she must have been on drugs or something. It ranks as one of the most incoherent statements ever made by a diplomat.
Her first mistake was to reference a Kiev-supplied social-media recording of the rebels celebrating shooting down an airliner. Normal protocol requires that no top government official ever use an audio recording in a major address until the CIA has determined that it was not a fake.
This one was compiled from three different clips, and done in a hurry. It seems a town 100 kilometers away from the alleged launch site is referenced. It is later discovered that these piecemeal recordings were discussing one of the earlier shoot downs.
With the US president standing beside her on the White house lawn, Power claimed East Ukraine separatists were the “most likely” culprits, yet allowed they did not have the skills, so Russia “probably assisted” them. But, she gave not a shred of real evidence.
That any major power would put a sophisticated high-altitude missile system in the hands of civil war participants, a hugely expensive one I might add… that idea is dead on arrival. It is inconceivable that any military chief of staff would allow something so crazy. Anyone who would even suggest such a thing would be sent out for mental observation.
SA-17
SA-17
The inference here is that the Russians had magically moved a SAM missile battery all the way from the border to the firing position.
But with US satellites monitoring all movements during this war, to supply itself, NATO and Kiev updated battlefield Intel, any move of Russian armor into Ukraine would have been spotted and Ms. Power would have shown us a nice big blowup photo, a la Cuban missile crisis, where the Soviet missile batteries were shown at the UN.
US and Russian spy satellites can track a tank shell being fired, not just see it fired, but see its flying through the air, and read a license plate, the uniforms of the troops… and yes, they can see everything moving at night. Both sides have huge digital maps showing the exact disposition of the forces on both sides.
A ground to air launch would be spotted in the first few seconds, the trajectory calculated and an emergency notice sent out with the GPS location to warn any aircraft in the area. The coordinates would immediately go to any commands capable of a counterstrike on the battery, so they could lock and load and wait for the order to fire. This is what the modern battlefield is like. Gaining a few seconds edge can be life or death in avoiding a disaster.
US satellites saw everything that happened, so the idea that an investigation is needed to determine the cause is a bad joke. You have not seen any overhead photos of the crash site, because the wide area of the wreckage is inconsistent with a missile shoot down, but something else they want to keep out of view.
The Russians were first o reveal that satellites could track all wheeled weapons systems in the conflict area, as would the US and NATO
The Russians were first o reveal that satellites could track all wheeled weapons systems in the conflict area, as would the US and NATO
The Russians let the cat out of the bag by admitting that their satellites had picked up a missile battery turning its tracking radar on. Of course they would have the GPS coordinates, and also the track of its firing, and the command intercept orders to do so, but did not disclose this.
It is known that both the US and Russia have all this, and neither the Netherlands nor Malaysia has demanded that the satellite information be released.
Ms. Power knows all of this, and with the president standing right beside her she was just lying to us all like we were just farm animals, versus citizens of an alleged democratic country.
Power should resign for her outrageous and incompetent performance, but Obama seems to have a fire proof staff, no matter how poorly they perform their jobs… a very dangerous situation when such people are at the helm of our national security, or insecurity, as the case may be.
As for our Congress and Western media, they are beneath contempt. It is like the real ones have been kidnapped and replaced with doubles as part of a science fiction psyops. They all spin the same pre-prepared talking points confirming who will be blamed, despite that being impossible to determine from the information they have at hand.
But they don’t care. It was simply a Russian bashing exercise for which they were primed anyway, and happy to get to time in front of the TV cameras.
But today my special contempt is for the Western leaders who also got on board the blame-Russia charade. From the beginning, every statement the Russians made was in support of an international investigation, even acknowledging that the country where it had happened bears primary responsibility for that. He did this when we all know that Kiev is the winner for the best motive contest, while the separatists and Russia have no motive.
Putin has shown he is immune from over reacting
Putin has shown he is immune from over reacting
All of the Western leaders, like the Brits, who have make threatening statements toward Russia and Putin, are aware of what the satellite Intel has revealed.
That is why they all have some qualifiers and some token wiggle room on their comments like “if it is determined that the Russians assisted”, etc. They are all lying by omission as the NATO countries especially have already been briefed.
Yet they all have engaged in what I can only describe an orgy of deception and manipulation of public opinion, on a level to disgrace calling themselves democracies.
They are, as a I am beginning to “rename” them, phony, fake or on a kind day… cartoon democracies, a form of governmental costume that they wear depending on the occasion.
The delay in getting the first outside investigators on scene, despite a war going on, was spun as evidence tampering, with no explanation given as to how citizen militias with no crash investigation experience would know how to do that. When the bodies were left out in the sun for a day, the screams of disrespect for the dead were soon to follow.
And when they were collected and moved into cold storage the following day, new screams of tampering with the evidence became the Western rage for the day. It was an embarrassing and pitiful display of national statesmanship which could have only been performed by a debased leadership.
What did the Russians do? …everything by the book. They said they would not accept any black boxes, that they should go through the established chain of evidence to the international investigators.
Putin and Lavrov had numerous calls with all of their counterparts all agreeing on a quick and impartial investigation, while the Western faction had their minions bashing the Russians for obstructing the investigation and threatening increased sanctions in retaliation.
Before the corpses had even gotten to the morgue, the West leaders were trying to milk all the new-sanctions momentum they possibly could from the tragedy. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, how many of these same people were bashing Kiev for its not having made a single arrest or issued a preliminary report on the Maidan killings?
The West seems totally disinterested in learning who brought the Maidan killers in
The West seems totally disinterested in learning who brought the Maidan killers in
We already know at VT that foreign mercenary contract killers were brought in to do the Maidan work and quickly exited the country. This eliminates a local guy bragging to his friends, family, or girlfriend, or shooting his mouth off while drunk in a bar one night.
When you use foreign killers, they are much easier to get rid of afterward, as their disappearance or accidental mishaps get no attention whatsoever. They are shadow people.
How much interest has the West shown in Kiev’s having become mercenary Central, deploying such thugs not only in the behind the scenes Intel and logistics slots, but as frontline units with bounty payback for their assassinations, some of this funded by the oligarchs? There has not been a peep from Western leaders about mercenaries “interfering” in a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
So yes, I will be returning to this theme of how, in the year 2014, we find ourselves plagued by Western leaders that give even the word a bad name. I will not be doing this as a personal Jihad. It is completely justifiable on national security grounds.
Such a collective leadership of such low quality assures us of a continual stream of foreign policy and financial disasters. And if you want some proof, just look back over the last 15 years, and you can find all that you can bear to read. But be sure to get your anti-depressant medication prescription refilled before you start. You will need it.

onsdag 30. juli 2014

  RAND CORPORATION

Plan” for Eastern Ukraine including Ground Assaults and Air Strikes

Region: 
In-depth Report: 

Barack Obama meets with Petro Poroshenko
GR Editor’s Note:  This report remains to be confirmed. So far we have not been able to corroborate this report from other news sources.
Confidential document on Ukraine by the RAND Corporation leaked. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko follows the action plan proposed by RAND analysts.
This Memorandum on the “advisable course of action” automatically means that the peace plan confirmed by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is slated  to fail.
The document provides three stages for the conduct of a military operation in eastern Ukraine.
The first stage implies total isolation of the region considering that all local citizens are terrorists or sympathizers.
The Region should be encircled with troops and sealed off entirely from any flow of goods and persons. Broadcasting services, Internet connection, telephone and mobile communications in the region shall be shut down.
The second stage is named Mop-up.
Ground assaults shall be preceded by air strikes against the strategic facilities. The use of non-conventional arms is allowed.
The document also provides for internment camps outside the cleared settlements. People featuring traces of combat engagement shall be tried in court for terrorism.
During the third stage Back to Normal power supplies and communications shall be restored. The borders shall be strengthened to avoid possible provocations. All the refugees should be checked for possible support for separatists in internment camps.
Special focus shall be made on information security. All foreign media shall be blocked there.
Commentary by AboveTopSecret.com 2014
Read carefully the text of the 2 page Memorandum below

tirsdag 29. juli 2014

NEW MH17 SENSATION: German experts point finger at Ukrainian air-force jets.


BY JOHN WARD

ukrainejetsSurface to air missile attack ruled out as calibre of cockpit bullet holes puts Ukraine pilots in the frame for MH17 murders

This is what a German pilot-cum-air technology expert Peter Haisenko has just published on the subject of the MH17 disaster (my emphases):
‘The misfortune of the Malaysian MH 017 is known to all. The flight
recorder is in England and is being evaluated. What can come of this?
May be more than you want to accept….if you look at the image of
Cockpit-Fragments, this picture is certainly shocking.
Entry And Exit holes from bullets in the area of the Cockpit. This is not speculation, but analysis of clear facts: the cockpit
shows clear evidence of bullet holes. You can see the entry holes and
some exit points. The edges of the bullet holes are bent inwards,
these are much smaller and round in shape. A 30mm calibre. The exit
holes are less well formed and the edges are torn outwards.
Furthermore it is visible that the exit holes have torn the double
aluminium skin and bent them outwards. That is to say, splinters from
inside the cockpit blew through the outside of the cabin. The open
rivets have also been bent outwards….There is only one conclusion one can make, and that is that this: the
aircraft was not hit by a missile. The damage to the aircraft is
exclusively in the cockpit area….
Armour-Piercing Ammunition. Russia has published radar data that a
Ukranian SU 25 was close to MH 017. this corresponds with Spanish air
traffic control that two Ukranian fighter aircraft were in direct
contact with MH 017. Examine the weaponry of the SU 25: it is fitted
out with a 30mm cannon Type GSch-302 /AO-17A, with 250 rounds of
splintering exploding bullets on a belt – shrapnel rounds. The cockpit
of MH 017 was hit from TWO sides, as there are entry and exit holes on
the same side….’
Very compelling stuff, is it not?
Now read this (also German) article by defence expert Bernd Biederman, who offers equally sound reasons why the
shooting down could NOT have been from a surface to air missile:
‘ the shooting down of the Malaysian
Boeing on July 17 in the Eastern Ukraine “could not have been hit by a
surface to air defense missile” .
This is the assessment of retired Colonel Bernd Biedermann in an
article for the daily newspaper published in Berlin “new Germany”
(Thursday edition). Had splinters from a surface to air missile hit
the plane, it would have immediately caught fire, argues the NVA
anti-aircraft missile specialist. His reasoning is because of the
“enormous frictional heat that the splinters generate on penetrating
the fuselage. A single splinter contains the same kinetic energy as a
40-ton freight car hitting the buffers at 60 kilometers per hour.” In
the case of the Malaysian Boeing, scattered fires had broken out after
the impact with the ground, because hot debris from the aircraft had
come in contact with combustible materials.
Biedermann is familiar with Soviet and Russian air defense technology,
he led units in the duty officer system in East Germany and taught at
the Military Academy in the field of anti-aircraft missile troops.’
Articles are beginning to appear across the Web to the effect that Angela Merkel is disturbed by (and growing tired of) the incessant US propaganda being emitted in favour of its energy agenda….and so we must perhaps in turn view these articles in the light of her alleged new agenda concerning the creation of an alternative bloc to that of America. (More on this here in the near future).
But spin or not, these analyses make sense. The US State Dept has now shifted its position from ‘Russian atrocity’ to ‘tragic accident’. The above opinions suggest that neither are true: they suggest strongly that the Ukrainian air force took out MH17.

Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/new-mh17-sensation-german-experts-point-finger-at-ukrainian-air-force-jets/#qLjJYW2B190cxHV7.99

mandag 28. juli 2014


 NOEN SLUKER ALT I FRA USA

USAs satelittbilder, viser at Russland skyter inn i Ukraina??
Hva med disse andre satelittbildene vedr Malaysia Airlines MH17, hvor er de??

Noen sluker det meste som måtte komme i fra USA bare det bærer benevnelsen USA.

Bildene viser et geografisk område hvor det er innplottet ”nærbilder” som kan være i fra hvor som helst. USA har ganske god trening i akkurat slike "dokumentasjoner og bevis" i fra mange situasjoner rundt om i verden, men har vært tatt med buksene nede hver gang.

Forøvrig glemte de å flytte grensene på ett av bildene slik at alt er på Ukrainsk side. Sammenligner en bildene, vil en også finne avvik på alle fire bildene.

Satellittbilde nr. 4 viser angivelige utskytingsramper eller områder samt nedslagsfelt. At alt syntes å være på Ukrainsk side av grensene, syntes ikke å være viktig når temaet er Russisk skyld og skyting over grensene.

Vedrørende satellittbilde nr. 2 så viser dette seg å være landbruksmaskiner, som”skurtreskere” eller tilsvarende. 

Satellittbilde nr.1 er i fra samme geografiske område.

Satellittbilde nr. 3 skal vise ”nedslagsfelt” men stemmer ikke helt i forhold til retningen. Snarere kan det se ut til at alt kommer i fra motsatt retning.

USAs "bevis" for Russisk medvirkning og aktive deltagelse  med skyting inn i Ukraina, er ikke så spesielt overbevisende som det de forsøker å få oss til å tro.






 USA har også i lengre tid hevdet å ha "fotobevis" for hvem og i fra hvor dette flyet MH17 ble skutt ned, men har sålangt ikke fremlagt annet enn klippede tlf samtaler og henvist til aktiviteter på sosiale medier. Alle teorier om andre alternative grunner og fra hvem som eventuelt har skutt ned flyet, er fullstendig avvist av USA og marionettregjeringen i Kyiv.

Det skal ikke glemmes, at det er bekreftet informasjon vedørende disse Ukrainske SU 25 jagerflyene i samme korridor til samme tid.

Jeg har tidligere innformert om at Ukraina selv har 5 slike luftvernbatterier, hvor av 3 er i Buk -M1 serien

 
Det kan se ut til at disse flyene var del av et treningsoppdrag for opplæring og praktisk bruk av BUK-M1 for det Ukrainske forsvaret. 2 SU-25 fly i fra 229 brigade Combat Aviation i Mykolayiv, ble sendt ut for å delta i treningsøkten fra Dnipropetrovsk flybase.
Opplæringen skulle inneholde luft rekognosering og identifisering, kontroll mål innen ATO grupperingen vest for Donetsk.
Batterimannskapet fra 156 Regiment, (BUK-M1) var plassert i nærheten av Zaroschenskoe, og skulle "skrive inn ett av flyene i deteksjonssonen SAM".

Det kan se ut til at her har vært et ”krysningspunkt” mellom jagerflyene og det sivile flyet, som har fått katastrofale følger.
Batteri kommandør hadde nøkler til å starte selve utskytingen, men det var ikke oppgitt at batteriet hadde raketter av 9M38M1.

Er dette årsaken til at hele batteribesetningen fra 156 Regiment er tatt i arrest?

Hvor er, og hva er årsaken til at SBU konfiskerte samtaleloggene mellom flytrafikk kontrollen og flygerne på Malaysian airlines umidelbart etter hendelsen (6.00)??

Disse protokollene er ikke fremlagt noen, og en skal ikke se bort i fra at disse nå ikke lengre finnes.
  
Mye har blitt gjort av USA og dets media for å få folk til å tro på at MH17 ble skutt ned av og i "opprørsholdte område", men få er klar over hvor lite det nevnte området faktisk er.

Det ukrainske militæret hadde allerede isolert opprørsområdet hvor Kiev og Washington insisterer på at en opprører-kontrollert BUK SAM rakett batteri hadde skutt passasjerfly.

Den faktiske størrelsen på dette området opprørerne holder er bare ca 24km bred.

Det hevdes at Ukrainske forsvar har fullt herredømme i luften.. Javell!?!

Mens MH17 nærmer seg en sørøstrute over Horlivka, frontlinjen av denne opprørsholdte sonen, mot Snezhnoye (Snizhne). Cruising i  933 kmph, ville MH17 har bare vært synlig for en svært kort tid - bare litt over ett minutt. 

Hvis Kiev ikke hadde beordret MH17 å endre sin kurs og høyde fra 35000fot til 33000fot ville det ikke ha vært synlig i det hele tatt fra utsiktspunktet på den påståtteopprører skytestillingen.”

  - en SA-11 (NATO kodenavn) eller 'BUK' missilsystemet krever 5 minutter satt opp med aktiv målretting, etterfulgt av en ytterligere 22 sekunders reaksjonstid ”for target låsing” og avfyring.

Ettersom MH17 var kun synlig for 60-70 sekunder over dette opprører holdte området rundt Grabovo, hvordan er det da mulig ??  Med mindre den påståtteopprører skytestillingen” ble rigget spesielt for sporing av MH17 lenge før det kom inn i opprørsholdt ”luftrom” og kunne skille det fra andre militære og sivile fly også i den generelle nærhet, Washingtons teori og Kievs anklager - om at opprørere skjøt ned dette flyet er enda svakere.
Vurderer en disse faktorene, øker sannsynligheten sterkt at målretting MH17 ville ha måttet bli gjort lang tid i forkant av de 60-70 sekundene det var synlig over dette spesielleopprører holdte” området.

Tar en i betraktnig det som flere hevder; at Ukraina har fullt ”luftherredømme” , blir dette noe mer oppklarende, og forsterker også det jeg skrev tidligere (ovenfor) om Ukrainsk aktivitet i området til samme tid med sine Buk M-1.
 Legger en til tidene/tidsperspektivet som er tilgjengelige, ser helheten noe forundrende ut.

MH17 var å se på radar sammen med 2 SU25 Ukrainske jagerfly kl.5.48

MH17 forsvant i fra radaren kl 5.54

SBU konfiskerte samtaleloggene mellom flykontrollen og MH17 kl 6.00

Kyiv holdt pressekonferanse / meldte om at MH17 var nedskutt kl. 6.00 Hvordan visste de??

Innenriksministeren visste at det var SU25 jagerfly sammen med MH17   kl 6.00 , men forsvarsministeren visste det ikke kl 7.15 ???

Ukrainske millitære ledelse bekreftet at jagerflyene var Ukrainske men visste ikke hvor ordren kom i fra kl 7.31



Noen hevder og referer også til at piloter i fra andre land har uttalt at de har tatt samme rute som MH17  fra Moskva til Europa… ja det høres jo naturlig ut. Like naturlig som om en skal kjøre bil i fra Oslo til Bergen med en naturlig tur innom Tromsø siden det er på den samme strekket.   

Når det da er kjent at det faktisk var Ukrainsk aktivitet i området med Buk M-1 plassert nær Zaroschenskoe (156 Regiment) og at dette batteriet var i satt opp med aktiv målretting (ca 5 minutters riggetid), trengte dette batteriet bare disse 22 sekundene på å låse sitt mål.
Det er her jeg tror tabben og tragedien startet.

Enten er det bltt gjort en feilberegning, eller at det ene SU 25 flyet har svingt unna og raketten har fortsatt etter det ”største målet” MH17, eller….

Noen må også komme med en god forklaring på hvordan og hvorfor Kyiv /Washington proklamerte dette allerede kl 6.00  … bare minutter etter treff. Flyet var knapt nådd bakken.

Og hvorfor har ikke USA lagt frem annet enn klippede tlf samtaler og henvisninger til sosiale medier mens de hevder å ha satelittfoto som viser hvor det ble skutt i fra.

Er det slik som Robert Parry har beskrevet.:



” Regarding the shoot-down of the Malaysian jetliner on Thursday, I’m told that some CIA analysts cite U.S. satellite reconnaissance photos suggesting that the anti-aircraft missile that brought down Flight 17 was fired by Ukrainian troops from a government battery, not by ethnic Russian rebels who have been resisting the regime in Kiev since elected President Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown on Feb. 22.
According to a source briefed on the tentative findings, the soldiers manning the battery appeared to be wearing Ukrainian uniforms and may have been drinking, since what looked like beer bottles were scattered around the site.”  ?????????

Et annet moment som er minst like interessant, er de bilder som er fremkommet av flyvraket og flyvrakets motorer. Dette var en Boing 777, med motorer med diameter på   
ca 3,2 meter. mens bildene som er fremkommet i fra vraket synliggjør noen vesentlig minde motorer. Så hva er fotografert og hvilket fly er fotografert. Er det virkelig MH17 som vises??

 



Real Evidence Points to US-Kiev Cover-up of Failed False Flag downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 on July 17th

Updated: 7-26-2014 

From Adam Baum  (blog)

MH17 HOAX: Crash Scene Evidence Reveals No Boeing-777 Engine

 It’s now established that US and international troops were deployed to the Ukraine under Exercise Rapid Trident - a 12-Nation joint military exercise in the Ukraine coinciding with the alleged crash of MH-17.
Rapid Trident Header US Army
WHAT IS RAPID TRIDENT?
Rapid Trident supports interoperability among Ukraine, the United States, NATO and Partnership for Peace member nations. The exercise helps prepare participants to operate successfully in a joint, multinational, integrated environment with host-nation support from civil and governmental agencies.
Rapid Trident is a part of U.S. European Command’s Joint Training and Exercise Program, designed to enhance joint combined interoperability with allied and partner nations.
The exercise also supports Ukraine’s Annual National Program to achieve interoperability with NATO and commitments made in the annual NATO-Ukraine work plan.
How many times have government and military exercises turned into false flag events like 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon Bombing and now – the sensationalized downing of  a Malaysian Airliner, MH-17, as another in a long line of False Flags. VIDEO: DAHBOO7 Opinion about Rapid Trident
 
RT News
Ukraine will play host, but the US military will call the shots, in an upcoming military exercise called Rapid Trident that will bring together some 1,300 international forces in Ukraine for a long-planned exercise.
Although the United States canceled Atlas Vision 2014, which was scheduled to take place in July in the northeastern Russian city of Chelyabinsk, the Pentagon says it will go ahead with plans for a multinational military exercise this summer in Ukraine.
Atlas Vision is a bi-lateral U.S-Russian Ground Forces exercise. The exercise will consist of a battalion-level command post exercise/Computer Assisted exercise and a platoon-level field training exercise.
Interesting how the media has erased the fact that Russia knows all about Rapid Trident including MH-17 evidence “irregularities”.
More interesting is that  Russia had planned to participate in one of these US-led events – Atlas Visionon their own soil.  Meanwhile, investigators and bloggers  continue to get blind-sided  by disinfo couched as insider “leaks” from allegedly trusted sources.
No doubt that every player forecasting the “new Cold War” are completely informed about the MH-17 hoax as integrated into a war games exercise.
When will investigators learn to look first, for the planned exercise as the pretext to a hoax/False Flag as was the case in 9/11, Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon Bombing.?

HOAX:  Bogus Engine Debris at Alleged MH-17 Crash Site

The huge, wide-body Boeing-777-200 is powered by one of the most powerful  turbofan engines in the world.

The General Electric GE90 engine has a diameter of 10.5 feet.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA No mammoth GE90 turbofan engine parts can be identified in crash scene photos.  Instead, the engine parts are much too small originate from a different type and design of aircraft.  It is certain to say that engine parts in the photographs could never have powered a Boeing 777 aircraft.
Coconuts TV Reports:
“Michael Holmes of CNN shared an image on Twitter via his account @holmescnn of a section of what appears to be a Malaysia Airlines jetliner on a grassy field. The Malaysian flag is clearly depicted and the red and blue livery colours used by MAS are also shown.”
The source of the images, a man identifying himself as a tourist guide / traveller / photographer / former soldier from Slovenia, @MatevzNovak, has since posted more photos – taken by a Nadezhda Chernetskaya – of what he claims to be the crash site of Flight MH17 in Grabovo, Ukraine. (TRNS)

No evidence of Boeing-777 engines at crash site could conclude that neither MH-17 nor MH-370 were struck by a missile!

Boeing fuselage window configuration once considered a clue to possible downing of MH-370 now deemed an irrelevant distraction.
mh17-starboard-crash-scene-2-panels
Suspicion that a counterfeit “MRD” section was conspicuously planted at the scene is further confirmed.
mh-17-crash-scene-tail-number-both-photos

__________

Maylasia-MH-17-HOAX
Related:

 

MH17 Verdict: Real Evidence Points to US-Kiev Cover-up of Failed False Flag

21st Century Wire
SPECIAL REPORT
UPDATED

Until this past Monday, the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 on July 17th, 2014, was a potential game changer for global geopolitics and the New Cold War. However, a funny thing happened on the way to the Kremlin…
In this report, we will lay out the facts based on a wide breadth of available information and data surrounding MH17. We will also present and give critique to Washington and Kiev’s “mountain of evidence” that has saturated US and European-based media coverage since the incident took place. 21WIRE has compiled this report with the help of many contributors and references from English-speaking media, as well as material translated from Russian and Ukrainian media sources, along with other historical referehttp://player.rutv.ru/iframe/video/id/822433/acc_video_id/610598?time_play=10.837000000000002&isPlay=true&showPopUpBtn=false&showZoomBtn=truences to provide context. Our objective is to get as close to the truth as possible. Although many revelations will appear to be self-evident, we still encourage the public to draw there own conclusions regarding this pivotal event.

There are other well-known anomalies surrounding this event which have been covered at 21WIRE, as well as connections to MH370, but for the purposes of this investigation we will focus on both factual and speculative evidence brought forth by the US, Ukraine and Russia.

As we will clearly demonstrate, the only wild conspiracy theories being pushed right now, are those coming out of the US State Department, and the government in Kiev, Ukraine, which are being repeated by CNN, BBC, FOX-NewsCorp, ABC, CBS and NBC…

The Brink of War

Last Monday morning was not a pleasant one for the US State Department. Russian officials surprised Washington and its NATO partners when it released all available satellite imagery and air traffic control data which was recorded in and around the final minutes of Flight MH17 – and presented it to the world media on live television. The data painted a very different picture, drawing contrasting conclusions to what Washington and Kiev officials had been disseminating via western media since July 17th. Following their presentation, Moscow handed its findings – air traffic data and time stamped satellite imagery – to European authorities. We will review those findings in detail later in this report. In stark contrast, US officials have been reluctant to do the same. Is Washington willing to share any object data or evidence to the public, or is it only interested in sharing that which somehow fits into the same predetermined narrative it stood by on July 17th, one which already assigned guilt to both rebel fighters in eastern Ukraine and Russia?

We hope that political leaders and media organizations in the US and Europe will take the time to consider all available information, rather than simply repeat and spin what is bouncing around the media echo chamber. It’s also crucial to understand the geopolitical context in which this incident has occurred in order to discover who really possessed the motive, and the means to destroy this passenger aircraft, and which parties stand to benefit most from such an international incident.

After reviewing the evidence, all indicators points to the downing of MH17 as a highly coordinated, but failed false flag event.

MH17: A Doomed Flight PathA Malaysian Airlines spokesman has already confirmed that, for some unknown reason, Kiev-based Ukrainian Air Traffic Control (ATC) ordered MH17 off of its original flight path along the international air route, known as L980.

Most likely, this order was given to pilots while MH17 was still in Polish air space. L980 is one of the most popular and most congested air routes in the world, as well as a key link between major international hubs in Europe, like London Heathrow, Amsterdam Schiphol, and Frankfurt, and Asian destinations, like Singapore, Mumbai, Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur.

MH-17-FLight-Path
As MH17 moved into Ukrainian air space, it was moved by ATC Kiev approximately 200 miles north – putting it on a new course, heading directly into a war zone, a well-know dangerous area by now – one that’s hosted a number of downed military craft over the previous 3 weeks.

Robert Mark, a commercial pilot and editor of Aviation International News Safety magazine, confirmed that most Malaysia Airlines flights from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur would normally travel along a route significantly further south than the route MH17 was diverted onto. Data on all airline flight records can be found here.
The fatal event occurred somewhere in the interval between 17:21:28 and 17:22:30 Moscow Time. The exact time of the crash is believed to be at 5:23pm. The last available geographic coordinates can be found here on Flight Radar24:
Weather and Visibility Factor

Kiev-based air traffic controllers not only led MH17 right over its alleged ‘target zone’ in Eastern Ukraine’s Donetsk region, but also helped make it visible

Although weather data online is all but unavailable for the area of Donetsk, Ukraine for July 17th, conditions are evident by numerous videos depicting the crash and crash site in the aftermath - it was cloudy and overcast, with more visibility above the cloud canopy. This factor is important because at the normal cruising altitude of 33,000 feet (10,000 meters), the airliner would not be visible from the ground in the rebel-held area where Washington is insisting a SAM missile was launched. Why Kiev air traffic controllers order MH17 to suddenly drop its altitude, from 35,000 feet to 33,000 feet, just before the plane’s demise is unknown for sure, but it would have been near impossible for the alleged rebel gunman occupying this relatively small rebel-held patch of land to make a visual sighting of MH17 and acquire the target during the 1-2 minute window they would have had (assuming they were even in possession of the BUK missile system).

To date, Kiev has refused to acknowledge or explain why the plane was moved into position in this way. Moreover, Interfax news agency reported that Ukraine’s SBU security service confiscated recordings of conversations between Ukrainian air traffic control officers and the crew immediately after the incident.

The probability that this is all an ‘unfortunate coincidence’ reduces to near zero when one considers the air traffic data and Kiev’s denial of the close proximity of its Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet in pursuit of MH17 minutes before the crash (see ‘Aircraft in the Vicinity’ below).

Small Rebel Target Window

Much has been made by the US and its media of MH17 being shot down and crashing in “the rebel-held area”, but few are aware of just how small the said area actually is. The Ukrainian military had already isolated the rebel area which Kiev and Washington insist a rebel-controlled BUK SAM missile battery had fired on the passenger jet. The actual size of this rebel-held patch is only 40-50 miles wide, with MH17 approaching on a southeastern route over Horlivka, the frontline of this rebel-held zone, towards Snezhnoye (Snizhne). Cruising at 58o mph (933 kmph), MH17 would have only been visible for a very short time – just over 1 minute (if Kiev had not ordered MH17 to alter its course and altitude then it would not have been visible at all), from the vantage point of the alleged rebel firing position. According the Jane’s Defense, the alleged cluprit – an SA-11 (NATO code name) or ‘BUK’ missile system, requires 5 minutes set-up active targeting, followed by an additional 22 seconds ‘reaction time’ for target acquisition and firing. As the MH17 was only visible for 70 seconds above this rebel-held area surrounding Grabovo, unless the alleged rebel firing position was specifically tracking MH17 long before it entered the rebel-held airspace and could distinguish it from other military civilian aircraft also in the general vicinity, Washington’s theory and Kiev’s accusation – that rebels shot down this aircraft becomes even weaker.

Considering these factors, the probability increases greatly that targeting MH17 would have had to be premeditated far in advance of the 70 seconds it was visible above this particular rebel-held area.

Russian Satellite Data and Public Presentation

On Monday, the Russian government, with almost every major global media outlet in attendance, released all of its air traffic data and satellite imaging data (in fact, only part of it) – all verifiable, including time stamps and supporting data. The entire content of the presentation was also handed over to the European authorities. The conclusions to be drawn from this are stunning, to say the least. Despite the public release of this information, US and British media outlets did report back to its people on these findings. They are as follows:

Minutes before the downing of MH17, the plane made a mysterious ‘Left Turn’ as it flew over the Donetsk area at approximately 5:20pm Moscow time, making a sharp 14km deviation, before attempting to regain its previous course before dropping altitude disappearing from radar at 5:23pm. As we previously pointed out, air traffic controllers in Kiev had already diverted MH17 200 miles further north into the target zone, so the question remains: was Kiev ATC also responsible for this final, fatal diversion, or is there another reason for this unusual turn (see ‘Mysterious Left Turn’, below)?

According to clear satellite images provided, on July 16th, the Ukrainian Army positioned 3-4 anti-aircraft BUK M1 SAM missile batteries close to Donetsk. These systems included full launching, loading and radio location units, located in the immediate vicinity of the MH17 crash site. One system was placed approximately 8km northwest of Lugansk. In addition, a radio location system for these Ukrainian Army missile batteries is situated 5km north of Donetsk. On July 17th, the day of the incident, these batteries were moved to a position 8km south of Shahktyorsk. In addition to this, two other radio location units are also identified in the immediate vicinity. These SAM systems had a range of 35km distance, and 25km altitude.

From July 18th, after the downing of MH17, Kiev’s BUK launchers were then moved away from the firing zone. 


Unlike rebel fighters, the Ukrainian military is in possession of some 27 BUK missile systems capable of bringing down high-flying jets, and forensic satellite imagery places at least 3 of their launchers in the Donetsk region on the day of this tragedy. Yet, Washington and NATO will not inquire about the possibility that any of these system had targeted MH17.

Watch the official video here: http://player.rutv.ru/iframe/video/id/822433/acc_video_id/610598?time_play=10.837000000000002&isPlay=true&showPopUpBtn=false&showZoomBtn=true

This is a definitive smoking gun: why did the Ukrainian Army move these short-range anti-aircraft SAM missile batteries into position on July 16-17th – to an interior region of East Ukraine where it’s known that the rebel resistance possess no air crafts whatsoever? Not surprisingly, both the US and Kiev have not answered that difficult question, perhaps for obvious reasons.

In addition, the Ukrainian Army’s radio location traffic near Donetsk peaked on the 16th and 17th, including a total of 9 separate radio location systems active. On the 18th and 19th of July, radio location traffic from these stations dropped sharply, down to 4 stations. If, as Washington/Kiev claims, rebels fired a BUK missile at MH17, then the rebel radar location signals would be clearly noted and verifiable on the day; only, they are not.

MH17-MAP

All Aircraft in the Vicinity

Between 5pm-6pm Moscow Time on July 17th, the following aircraft have been identified in the general vicinity of MH17 on its course heading to its fatal destination of Grabovo:

1. Boeing 772 – traveling southeast from Copenhagen to Singapore at 5:17pm
2. Boeing 778 – traveling southeast from Paris to Taipei at 5:24pm
3. Boeing 778 – traveling northwest from Delhi to Berlin circa 5:20pm
4. Boeing 777 – Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 at 5:17pm
5. Su-25 Ukrainian Fighter Jet appears on radar, trailing MH17 at same altitude, est. 4km behind it at 5:21pmNote: the pilots and passengers of Singapore Airlines Flight SIA351 were close enough to have visually observed, at high altitude, the demise of MH17.

At 5:20pm MH17 began to abruptly lose speed, eventually slowing to 124mph (200kmph). At this time, a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter jet appears on ATC radar and trailing MH17 on the same flight path approximately 2-3km behind MH17, and at the same altitude – only minutes before MH17 disappeared on radar. The Su-25 would not have been visible on ATC radar before it broke the ATC long-range standby radar tracking ceiling of 5km in altitude. Civilian ATC radar would not be able to identify this Su-25 as military because no secondary detection system is mounted – typical for military aircraft. Note also that the Su-25 is armed with air-to-air missiles with a range of 5km-12km. Over the next four minutes, the Ukrainian fighter remained in the area.

Another Smoking Gun: Kiev government officials insisted on July 17th that, “No military aircraft were available in the region”. Based on available data detailed above, this appears to be a lie, indicating that a cover-up was taking place.

Again, it’s important to note here that at the moment when MH17 was allegedly was hit for the first time, at around 5:23pm Moscow time, the passenger jet was also within the range of several Ukrainian BUK batteries deployed close to Donetsk and as well as the Ukrainian Army’s BUK system positioned on the day just 8km south of Shakhterskoye, only a few miles from the eventual crash site at Grabovo.
 


IMAGE: A Ukrainian military Su-25 fighter jet carries air-to-air missiles.

MH17′s Mysterious Left Turn

On passing glance, this seemingly minor, yet unexplained  event doesn’t appear to be significant, but as is often the case, the devil is in the detail.

Again, was Kiev ATC also responsible for MH17′s final and fatal diversion from its course, or is there another reason for what appears to be an evasive maneuver?

One very real possibility for MH17 losing being diverted 14km to the left is that its GPS or navigation system was being jammed. US-NATO forces happened to be conducting an electronic warfare exercise in the Black Sea on July 17th (see ‘SEA BREEZE 2014′, below). In addition to this possibility, all Boeing jets (except Germany’s Lufthansa fleet) are equipped with a remote override that can be accessed by authorities in certain foreign countries, one being the United States. Although not publicly acknowledged until recently, Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot (BUAP) systems have been standard since the late 1990′s, apparently designed to take control of a commercial aircraft away from the pilot or flight crew, chiefly in the event of a terrorist incident.

Another possible explanation for this crucial event in the timeline is that MH17 was hit, or damaged, taking an emergency 180º left turn for 14km, before disappearing completely off of radar. This appears to be the case. On July 23rd, 
Anna-News published an interview with retired Russian Air Force colonel Aleksand Zhilin (Александр Жилин) a frequent military commentator on Ukraine’s Civil War.

“According to the colonel, at 16:19:45 (local time, and 5:19pm Moscow time), a Ukrainian jet fighter targeted the Boeing with an air-to-air missile R-60. The missile damaged the right engine of the Boeing. The Boeing was hit, but still managed to stay in the air. However, in doing so, the Boeing turned 180 degrees to the left. It was at this moment that the false flag attack started falling apart. According to Zhilin, part of the plan controlled by the US with Ukrainian hands executing it was to have the Boeing crash past the southern frontline by the Ukrainian-Russian border. Had the Boeing fallen there, securing the crash sites with the troops in response to international pressure was on top of all else effectively to allow Kiev to lift the encirclement of its brigades (currently pinned down by rebels) in the southern pocket by the Russian border.”

“When, however, the Boeing started to turn in the opposite direction and was still apparently manageable, the US-Ukrainian headquarters of the special operation panicked and ordered the Buk battery to destroy the plane in the air in order to pre-empt the possibility of the Boeing’s emergency landing. A Buk missile was fired and the plane was then finally destroyed.”
21WIRE spoke to former Czech diplomat and political analyst, Vladimir Suchan, who puts Zhilin’s comments into context of what was happening militarily at the time of the crash. Suchan explains, “If MH17 was hit right over the frontline over Snezhnoye, this would have placed the timing and location of the intended downing and crash site to  either the territory controlled by the Ukrainian army, or much closer to the border between Russia and Ukraine where the “securing of the site” would allow lifting the strategic encirclement of the Ukrainian troops in the south and thus, on top of other objectives, saving Kiev’s armed forces from its first major military defeat.” (see ‘Military All-Out Offense’ section below)

If, indeed MH17 was struck by an air-to-air missile at that time, a distress call may have been sent to Kiev ATC, but as yet, Kiev officials may be reluctant to share, or release the entirety of its communications from July 17th. 

At the time of this report being filed at 21WIRE, a second source to verify this testimony is not presently available. Zhilin’s account certainly makes sense when placed next to all ATC and satellite data released by Moscow. However, flight recorder information and data from MH17′s black boxes would certainly be able to corroborate this timeline of events, and one hopes that Great Britain’s predetermined political stance against Russia does not prevent Downing Street, or MI5 Intelligence Services from releasing the black box information in its entirety and more importantly, a full and unedited disclosure to the media. More than likely, the BBC will have first access to this release, and how the BBC report their findings will be very telling.


Above, is one possible map of MH17 final minutes, as calculated from one source of available public data, available here: http://nikolay-istomin.livejournal.com/3057934.html.

This account is also consistent with the location of key pieces of wreckage scattered over the wider crash site radius. It shows M17 turning back on itself, after being struck initially. If this was the final path, then it completely disapproves the US (US State Department) conspiracy theory that a rebel-controlled BUK missile hit the plane head-on from Snezhnoye (Snizhne). This U-turn then also helps explain why Kiev’s first “leaked conversation of the rebels” (see ‘Kiev’s Botch Social Media Audio’ below) tried to place the rebel’s BUK battery at a completely different location in Debaltzevo, a few kilometers northwest of the main crash site at Grabovo. However, that would not explain the U-turn, which they tried so much to conceal – for it points to the Ukrainian jet fighter.

As part of their PR damage-control exercise, Washington released this Google Map-style graphic on Tuesday July 22nd, illustrating its theory that the rebel missile battery was now located in Snezhnoye:

1-US-BUK-MISSILE-HOAX
Incredibly, Washington’s latest evidence/theory, depicted above, put their alleged rebel firing position in an entirely new spot – at Snezhnoye, and this now contradicts other ‘social media’ items being held-up by John Kerry and President Obama in their “mountain of evidence” (see ‘More Falsified and Sloppy ‘Evidence’ Supplied by SBU’, below).

The irony of this somehow escaped US State Dept. Deputy Spokesperson, Marie Harf during her globally televised ‘intelligence’ briefing on Tuesday (see ‘US Now in Full Retreat and Damage-Control Mode’, below).

Almost certainly, the US government already has a comprehensive communications, satellite and radar data set which could either corroborate, or disprove what Russia has released. The fact that Washington only has this Google graphic to offer to the public indicates that what it has… may not be what it wants.

Whistleblower: A Spanish Air Traffic Controller in KievAll evidence pointing to a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter jet in the same frame as MH17, also validates the testimony of ‘Carlos’, an ATC contractor in Kiev. 
ETN received information from an air traffic controller (Borispol Airport) in Kiev on Malaysia Airlines flight MH17:

“This Kiev air traffic controller is a citizen of Spain and was working in the Ukraine. He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on board. The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down. Military air traffic controllers in internal communication acknowledged the military was involved, and some military chatter said they did not know where the order to shoot down the plane originated from. Obviously it happened after a series of errors, since the very same plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar.”


Again, real mounting evidence which points to an obvious cover-up by Kiev and its NATO partners.

CSI: Flight MH17
Crime scene investigation is important, although reports to date from the crash site in Grabovo do not inspire very much confidence that a thorough and independent forensic investigation will be carried out, or that the chain of custody for evidence is being observed. The key evidence would be ballistics, including pieces of shrapnel retrieved from the wreckage. It should be easy to determine if they came from any of the following:

1. A bomb on board (this is still a possibility).
2. An air-to-air missile. 
3. A surface-to-air missile.

After that, the autopsy of the bodies would reveal additional evidence about what really took place on July 17th. A present, the majority of the remains are being handled by the Netherlands government, and given their NATO involvement to date in the Ukrainian conflict, it’s debatable whether or not they would present any findings which do not square with Washington and Kiev’s narrow, yet ever-evolving narrative of the incident.
Finally, if MH17 was indeed shot down as a false flag provocation of war by either a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter, or a Ukrainian Army BUK SAM – or both, as much of the hard evidence suggests, then would Malaysia declare war on the Ukraine? Would the UN table a resolution backing sanctions against Ukrainian officials in Kiev for their role in this international war crime?

US-NATO’s Military Drill in the Black Sea Ended on July 17th

Russia’s Satellite Data and Public Presentation on Monday July 21st has put Washington on its back foot. The existence of this intelligence, now made public, along with other data in Russia’s possession, means that the Washington cannot show the real intelligence – which they too have. It’s no coincidence that US and NATO conducted a large-scale military and intelligence drill in the Black Sea just south of Crimea named, SEA BREEZE 2014, which just so happened to end on… July 17th. The drill included hundreds of US military specialists running ‘war simulations’ in electronic warfare, data collection from a spy satellite, and ‘monitoring’ of all passenger aircraft flying in the region. A massive drill – yet another improbable coincidence.

Another smoking gun: Is it a coincidence that the US had its new experimental satellite positioned over Eastern Europe for 1-2 hours, and directly over Donetsk in eastern Ukraine from 5:06pm – 5:21pm. Taking this fact into consideration, alongside the other improbable ‘coincidences’, leads to an almost certain conclusion.

In addition to SEA BREEZE, both US and British armed forces had also scheduled a concurrent military exercise, code named, Rapid Trident 2014, a NATO event which takes place annually in and around the Ukraine, designed to “promote regional stability and security, strengthen partnership capacity and foster trust while improving interoperability between the land forces of Ukraine, and NATO and partner nations,” according to the US Forces in Europe website. Since March, the Pentagon has kept quiet regarding the number of US forces, and hardware assets expected to participate in the maneuvers.

According to 
US Army spokesman Col. Steven Warren, Rapid Trident is the only Ukraine military exercise the US planned to participate in this year, and it’s main purpose was, “To help the Ukrainian military improve its troops and weapons operability with NATO forces.” 


Ukrainian Military All-Out Offensive Timed For July 18th

Three uncomfortable realities in Kiev were prevailing before the downing of MH17 on July 17th.

First, the troops were losing morale, and suffering defections and other serious set-backs in an increasingly unpopular military theater of Eastern Ukraine.  Kiev was losing the PR war hearts and minds in the Ukraine and abroad. 

After the downing of MH17, Kiev garnered huge public sympathy and support, and just so happened to launch a massive offensive on July 18th, one which military analysts believe would have to have been planned many weeks in advance – and could not just be a knee-jerk reaction to the MH17 tragedy as government spokespersons in Kiev insist.

Secondly, they were losing the war. 
Behind the lines battle reports from Igor Strelkov’s blog at the time confirms this all-out offensive at Snezhnoye by the Kiev military planners against the People’s Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk – allowing the Ukrainian Army to penetrate deeper and deeper, in effect splitting Donetsk and Lugansk. 

Vladimir Suchan adds, “After the loss of MH17 and some talk about “humanitarian ceasefire”, the Kiev regime launched three massive offensives from the north, the west (from Artemovsk, which included a large tank attack) and in the south. Since it always takes some good time to prepare an offensive, this had to be planned sufficiently ahead, though, with a view of the desperate situation for the junta in the south, most likely at a very accelerated pace.  http://voicesevas.ru/news/yugo-vostok/2968-voyna-na-yugo-vostoke-onlayn-18072014-hronika-sobytiy-post-obnovlyaetsya.html

“In this regard, it is also very plausible that some hope was put on having the command of Novororrysia paralyzed, busy and distracted over MH17. 
By all accounts, both the timing and location of the MH17 crash, has enabled a huge ‘game changer’ in terms of how this conflict was previously going.”

If the international community were indeed to connect the prospect of a  false flag attack on MH17 with the false flag attack by Maidan snipers back in February, and the attempted false flag attack with the Odessa massacre, perhaps the Ukrainian Civil War could be abated, for the right reasons.

As the US media juggernaut rolls ahead, there is still no sign of either Washington, London or Brussels admitting that their partners in Kiev are massacring civilians in a brutal civil war…


Disturbing reports are also coming in about the Ukrainian Military dropping White Phosphorus on civilian targets this week, as forces continue bombarding areas surrounding of Lugansk. Here are two unconfirmed videos, possible evidence of unconventional chemical weapons being deployed over several locations near Lugansk People’s Republic of Novorossia, from July 20-21, 2014:

See Videos here :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_duglYa707I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=r45n-PV2oq4

    
Thirdly, Kiev is going broke trying to fund what appears to be an ethnic cleansing campaign in eastern Ukraine. Sources from the Parliamentary budget office in Kiev now confirm that as of August 1st, Kiev can’t pay its military (who are, in fact, waging war against its own people and calingl it ‘anti-terror operations).

“To continue the anti-terrorist operation in eastern Ukraine, it  is necessary to amend the state budget and to find additional sources of its content. We do not have money to pay at least a cash security to our military from August”, stated Ukraine’s Finance Minister Oleksandr Shlapak, speaking in Parliament this week. According to Shlapak, funds previously provided by the state budget for these purposes has been calculated for the period prior to July 1st, and continued operations will require additional funds totaling 9 billion UAH ($1 billion). Infighting has already begun, as MP’s are now blaming the Ministry of Defense and army staff for corruption and looting of money.
In the wake of the MH17 disaster, US and its NATO allies are responding with a renewed call for more military aid to Kiev and to fast-track the Ukraine’s membership into Washington’s overseas military surrogate, NATO. As an emergency response to “secure the crash site”, NATO stalwart, The Netherlands, are weighing up deploying NATO troops into the middle of this war zone. Such a move could easily cascade into something much worse should another bizarre “accident” occur, or some tragedy befalls Dutch troops inserted into the hot zone.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has responded with strong words of condemnation, stating, No matter what our Western counterparts tell us, we can see what’s going on. As it stands, NATO is blatantly building up its forces in Eastern Europe, including the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea areas. Its operational and combat training activities are gaining in scale.”

While the US push Kiev eastwards to fight Washington’s proxy war against Russia, the political and financial situation in Kiev is rapidly falling apart.

On Thursday July 24th, Victoria Nuland’s hand-picked coalition leader following a US-backed violent military coup back in February, Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy ‘Yatz’ Yatsenyuk (photo, left) announced his resignation in connection with the collapse of a Washington-designed coalition and parliament blocking government initiatives.

Watch as a fist fight break out this week between Washington’s new Neofascist partners during a Parliament session in Kiev:

 

His resignation indicates that ‘Yatz’ may be falling out of favor with central planning in Washington, and a sign of chaos still to come in the halls of Kiev’s Parliament.

Made-up ‘Evidence’ From Washington and Kiev

The talking point shift by the US media on Tuesday July 22nd was an obvious reaction to the Russian data dump. US media are now airing Washington DC’s revised conspiracy theories. Theory 1) “The rebels shot MH17 down by mistake”, and Theory 2) “Russia is responsible for creating the conditions for this tragedy”.

In reality, no evidence actually exists to date, other than anecdotal, that the rebels in the east possess any ‘BUK’ surface-to-air missile systems (see Washington and Kiev’s ‘BUK’ Missile Evidence Debunked’, below).

Close observers of Washington DC’s media blitz can only be left with a feeling of embarrassment, as the US State Department still clings to some semblance of continuity in the face of a total PR meltdown. As late as July 22nd, the US State Department was  still attempting to pass-off its ‘evidence’ from social media (Twitter and YouTube), and backed-up by what it claims is “common sense”, that “clearly indicates Ukrainian militia shot down MH17″.

Since the incident on July 17th, the Kiev regime and US State Department have built their case against Rebels in eastern Ukraine and Moscow, and even Vladimire Putin himself, on the following items, which have all been thoroughly discredited by now:

1. The audio  “tapes” issued by Kiev
2. A video and photos of BUK missile batteries issued by Kiev (of their own BUK missile batteries)
3. Claims by Kiev and supported by the West, that Ukraine had “no military aircraft in the air” at the time of the crash of the MH17 plane. 

On July 22nd, the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko (photo, left) was forced to change Kiev’s story - a damage-control exercise to  the overwhelming evidence against Ukraine. He has since reversed this position.

Suchan explains the western political media machine and its all-out effort to cast Russia and Putin as international pariahs over the incident:

“What has been thus established is that Ukraine, as well as the US, the EU, NATO, and other Western countries, have been systematically and grossly lying about evidence pertaining to the tragedy of MH17, thus willfully – and bluntly, abusing the tragedy and the demise of the victims and the suffering of their families for perverse political goals related to NATO expansionism and anti-Russian hysteria, and ‘Russophobia’, in order to support an openly fascist regime in Kiev, whose objective is the deliberate destruction of civilians and civilian infrastructure in east Ukraine.”

“The smearing campaign has also been used to demonize and criminalize anti-fascism and its resistance to a fascist dictatorship in Kiev, enrolled by Ukraine’s criminal oligarchs.”


Washington and Kiev’s ‘BUK’ Missile Evidence DebunkedImmediately after the MH17 crash event on July 17th, the Ukrainian government in Kiev quickly uploaded a brief YouTube video it purported to be ‘evidence’ of “a ‘BUK’ missile system being moved” out of a rebel-held area near Donetsk. US State Department officials, and every US media outlet, led by CNN, FOX, ABC, NBC and CBS, along with major US talk radio hosts like Sean Hannity, immediately jumped on this 5 second YouTube video claiming it was, “Irrefutable proof that a Russian-made BUK missile system was being moved away after it shot down MH17″. That talking point began to cascade from media, and into public chatter. It seemed their job was all but done.

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation newspaper , The Sun, always ready to take any pro-war line to the extreme, led the ‘conflict pornography’ on news stands, intentionally inciting fear and jingoism, doing what it always does: nudge British working class readers in a predetermined direction and fuse public opinion among differing classes on divisive international issues. No surprise then, as The Sun ran, “Putin’s Missile” as its headline the next morning. Similar covers and headlines were cloned across US and British media. Within hours of the news breaking – and despite this blanket coverage, not one of these newspapers or TV broadcasters offered any real evidence outside of anecdotal and wild speculation and conjectural theories.

Once again, we’ve witnessed world’s most powerful, highly coordinated and synchronized propaganda machine. Once it’s set in motion, most western consumers are helpless to fend off it’s relentless repeating and universal coverage across hundreds of media outlets owned in most part by 5 US, and 2 British corporations.

A similar attempt was made by Washington and London last September, when US Secretary of State John Kerry, along with then British Foreign Secretary William Hague, presented their now infamous claim of ‘open source evidence’ (YouTube videos) used to assign blame to the Syrian government for a chemical weapons attack against its own people. Many of the photos and videos were later proven to be faked and staged, and ‘the gas’ was made in Britain, and that ‘chemical attack’ was in fact staged by Syrian insurgents still being supported by the US-British-Saudi-Qatari Axis.

Washington’s initial ‘BUK Missile’ social media evidence seems to be rapidly heading down the same memory hole as its Syria predecessor, and soon, it will not be mentioned again by any US official. The speed at which it was released after the crash, and the fact that falsified audio, video, and photos have been intentionally released by the Kiev government in the wake of such a tragedy, demonstrates a clear motive to deceive the public about who is to blame for the MH17 event – using falsified evidence to build a case against ‘pro-Russian separatists’ and Moscow, and even Russian President Vladimir Putin himself.

What is obvious, but not being discussed in mainstream western circles, is that like Syria, Washington and its NATO allies have been openly conducting a proxy war in the Ukraine, and have managed to control media coverage in the west so that what clearly a Civil War in the Ukraine – is being cynically, and very wrongly labeled as an “anti-terror operation”. On a daily basis, the Ukrainian Military are carrying out attacks on civilian targets all over Eastern Ukraine, killing thousands of its own innocent citizens with the full logistical and financial backing of the Washington and NATO. In Syria, the tables are reversed, where the government in Damascus is clearly fighting against known al Qaeda and ISIS-linked foreign terrorists brigades, as Washington and London politicians and media insist on calling it a ‘civil war’. Both are classic proxy wars being waged by the NATO block of nations.

More Falsified and Sloppy ‘Evidence’ Supplied by SBU Defense Ministry in Kiev

Let’s start with the famous 5 second YouTube video released by Kiev and lauded by Washington, CNN, ABC, FOX et all, of a BUK missile battery being moved, we were told, secretly by rebels out of the area after the plane crash.
Not only does signage clearly visible in the video place this truck in Krasnoarmeysk – a town which has been in control of the Ukrainian Army since May 11th. Here is one early news release of the now discredited video. 

In the absence of any real evidence or data, it’s worth asking who has paid large sums of money to create a 3-D computer animation sequences, of what the US/Kiev governments claim look place?

In addition to falsified YouTube video, Kiev also published falsified photos of an alleged BUK missile system on July 19th. 
Kiev’s Security Service (SBU) published photos online it claimed showed ‘Russia’ secretly withdrawing a BUK-M system from the Ukraine civil war zone, but shortly after publishing this article the photos in question were deleted. The photo released by Kiev was actually an image taken of its own military’s BUK missiles – ironically, our readers will find that Kiev showing photos of its own systems is much closer to the real story than we previously thought.

Somewhat haphazardly, Kiev’s SBU, which is overseen by the new CIA station occupying the top floor in the same building in Kiev, released two more videos meant to assign blame to rebels in Donetsk, with Kiev claiming these were of Russian-made BUK-M being transported back to Russia on July 18th after the crash – but both videos were clearly shot during the winter time, with one found to have been previously published in March. Again, more intentional lying by Kiev, in order to assign blame to ‘pro-Russian Separatists’, and Moscow.

Kiev’s Botched Social Media ‘Audio Clips’

Early on, Washington and the entire western media machine, made much of two audio ‘tapes’ released via YouTube by Kiev officials, alleged to be taken from conversations between ‘pro-Russian separatist’ rebel commanders. Both Kiev and Washington held these up as ‘evidence’ of rebels using a BUK SAM missile system to shoot down MH17. The only problem here, is that both ‘tapes’ contradict each other regarding the location of the alleged missile batteries.

Vladimir Suchan
points out the obvious, “The identification of the direction of the blast then also disproves the junta’s videos with “leaked conversations” from yesterday and today–for the missile could not then be launched either from Debaltzevo, or Donetsk, as claimed on both tapes -these places were by then a bit far, and not in front of MH17. That’s also evidently why, today the junta’s sites are claiming that the BUK missile battery was supposed to be in Snezhnoye, forgetting all about their first tape leak with commander ‘Bes’ from Gorlovka (40 miles north-west). If the Ukrainian Army used a BUK missile, then it would most likely have been fired from north of Amvrosivka, which is a place of a large concentration of Ukrainian troops. It is also southwest of Torez and Snezhnoye in the proximity of which the crash site is located. BUK missiles have a range of up to 20 miles. Enough for a battery in the Amvrosivka region.”


Zero Hedge reported on July 17th:

The only problem is that there is absolutely no way to confirm who “Major” and “Grek” are, and considering the entire Ukraine civil war has been merely one provocation and counter-provocation after another, explicitly staged in advance by either the CIA on the side of Kiev or the Kremlin on the Russian side, one does have to wonder whether the said two “smoking gun” participants aren’t merely two random people speaking Russian and reading off a script?The clip concludes with another unnamed “Militant” who supposedly is speaking to Mykola Kozitsyn, one of the purported leaders of the Cossacks operating in east Ukraine. The Militant makes it clear to Kozitsyn that it is not a military plane and has “Malaysian Airlines” written on the side. One wonders just where one could find such writing on the side of the crashed and exploded fuselage but that one is for the forensics to decide.”
In addition, multiple independent analysis’s of these audio recordings also reveals that these audio recordings were not integral files, indicating they were spliced together, as is evident from the different time stamp dates visible from the raw audio data. It also reveals at least one portion was recorded, or edited on July 16th – before the crash of MH17. ITAR-TASS Agency confirms this:“The tape’s second fragment consists of three pieces but was presented as a single audio recording. However, a spectral and time analysis has showed that the dialog was cut into pieces and then assembled. Short pauses in the tape are very indicative: the audio file has preserved time marks which show that the dialog was assembled from various episodes, the expert said. The tape’s linguistic analysis also shows that those who made the faked tape clearly did not have enough material and time, the expert said. That is why, speech fragments can hardly correlate with each other in terms of their sense and the spectral picture of audio materials also differs, the expert said. But the most indicative moment is that the audio tape clearly shows that it was created almost a day before the airliner crash, the expert said.”


Only one conclusion can be drawn here: these tapes were faked, and released after the crash in order to assign blame on rebels and Russia for this event.

In addition to this, video production on both Kiev ‘tapes’ matches a previous YouTube video – same graphics style and editing, which was previously proven to be another fake. Interestingly, Ukrainian producers used the same actor, an alleged Cossack rebel commander, Mykola Kozitsyn, in their MH17 audio production. Zero Hedge also reveals: “Finally, we clearly have no way of authenticating the recording or the participants, it was just over a month ago, on June 5, when in another attempt to cast blame and discredit the separatists, Ukraine released another trademark YouTube clip seeking to disparage and frame Kozitsyn, entitled “Russian Cossack Formations are Responsible For Chaos In Ukraine.”In summary, multiple falsified information releases by Kiev government officials only points to one conclusion: a cover-up. By contrast, Russia officials have not released or promoted any falsified or fraudulent ‘evidence’ used to assign blame to any parties – instead Moscow released all of its verifiable data surrounding the incident which has now forced Washington to rethink its wild approach which previously tried to pin responsibility on Russia itself…

IMAGE: President Obama and John Kerry unable to settle on a version of events (Photo: RCJ)Up until now, Washington has been able to give its support to openly fascist and racists political parties and militants in western Ukraine, but as Kiev’s brutal civil war wages on, world media and more historically-minded members of Europe may eventually revolt against this risky marriage of convenience.

US Now in Full Retreat and Damage-Control Mode

Amazingly, in a US State Department briefing led by Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf on Tuesday July 22nd, Harf insisted that, yes, US intelligence officials still include these ‘social media’ posts as part of what Secretary of State John Kerry describes as a “mountain of evidence”.

Obviously under great pressure to show strength in the face of a complete collapse in confidence, Harf (photo, below) could be seen stuttering and twitching nervously as difficult questions were raised by members of the media.


#MARIE HARF: Under President Obama, State Department spokespersons have become ‘political activists’.

In one of the biggest flops in State Dept. history, Harf appeared so desperate to shed any further questions on ‘social media evidence’, that she opted for a fatal gaff - stating on record that “US intelligence officials have authenticated the audio”. Unless she means they’ve authenticated these as fake, this statement may come back to haunt US officials. Many are now calling it a bold-faced lie, designed to cover-up the mishandling and over-politicization of posts found on social media, shamelessly used by Washington to promote a war agenda.

As a result, CNN and others are now scavenging the tragedy, trying to hide the emerging facts under the heap of its “fair and balanced” mainstream conspiracy theories. The story has now shifted from what happened, to how US politicians are dealing with the crisis, as was evident after one major outlet who ran this headline, “Obama: What exactly are they trying to hide?” 
On Tuesday, the US government finally admitted (as well as it could), that it had been bluffing about its ‘certainty’ that Russia was behind the downing of Malaysian Air Flight MH-17.

Washington’s New Conspiracy Theory
In a damage control exercise this past Tuesday, Washington invited members of the majors like the Washington Post and the LA Times, to an ‘intelligence update’ briefing, and a press conference run by the inexperienced Marie Harf.

The Los Angeles Times reported: “U.S. intelligence agencies have so far been unable to determine the nationalities or identities of the crew that launched the missile. U.S. officials said it was possible the SA-11 [anti-aircraft missile] was launched by a defector from the Ukrainian military who was trained to use similar missile systems.”
The quiet U-turn by Washington signals that its previous case blaming the rebels has been destroyed, and rather than concede that the Ukrainian Army has actually shot down MH17, they’ve chosen to instead concoct a new revision about a “rogue defector” and his “rogue team” who happen to be wearing Ukrainian Army uniforms.

Washington’s new and creative official conspiracy theories now include:

1. Ukrainian separatists shot down plane by mistake after misreading ‘fuzzy’ radar images on a much-too sophisticated AS-11 system (as if US intelligence officials were actually there), probably mistook the airliner for a Ukrainian military plane (reverting to their original line).
2. Missile that brought down Malaysian jet probably fired by ‘ill-trained crew’ of pro-Russian rebelsThe “ill-trained crew” theory is the work of one U.S. official who, “requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the issue”. And who could blame him?

Finally, Washington ends up at a place it knows well – reducing a major geopolitical event or crime down to the work of a lone wolf, or in this case, a ‘rogue defector’ from the Ukrainian Army, an image which will no doubt fuel even more wild commentary by Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, George Stephanopoulos and Sean Hannity.

American investigative reporter Robert Parry (who broke many of the Iran-Contra scandal for AP and Newsweek in the 80′s) published this on Consortium News, July 20th (based on his CIA source):

“What I’ve been told by on
e source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.” 

This account is fully consistent with 1) the “anonymous US intelligence officers’ briefing from US mainstream media on Tuesday July 22,” as reported, 2) the briefing by the Russian Ministry of Defense on July 21 and, 3) Alexandr Zhilin‘s analysis previously covered.
Backpedaling even further, Washington has officially downgraded its overall indictment, with another ‘senior intelligence official’ announcing a brand new party line – a weaker thesis, somehow claiming that, “Russia created the conditions for this to happen”

More Western Media Manipulation

London’s media arms have also sprung into action in an attempt to reinforce Washington-NATO-Kiev Axis assignment of guilt. In a classic demonstration of its pro-Foreign Office institutional bias, Guardian writer Shawn Walker carefully attempts to contain the western guilty verdict, considering only ‘pro-Russian rebels’ and intentionally reinforcing the ‘Rebel-BUK conspiracy theory’.

Walker states, “
Claims by pro-Russia separatists in east Ukraine that they have never been in possession of the missile launcher apparently used to down flight MH17 are looking increasingly flimsy, as several witnesses told the Guardian they had seen what appeared to be a Buk missile launcher in the vicinity of the crash site last Thursday.The sightings back up a number of photographs and videos posted online that put the Buk system close to the crash site on the day of the disaster. Just before lunchtime last Thursday, prior to the Malaysia Airlines plane’s takeoff, a Buk was driven through Gagarin Street, one of the central thoroughfares of Torez, witnesses said.”

The Guardian could very well be relaying genuine eyewitness accounts here, but only advanced media watchers will have noticed the slight of hand being applied here: Walker has ruled out any other possible suspects other than rebels – skillfully hiding his paper’s bias in reporting by pouring evidence collected into a pre-determined verdict. If the Guardian were not applying an institutional (British Foreign Office pre-determined conclusion) bias, then its editor would have combined the eyewitness accounts to the clear satellite photographic evidence provided by the Russian authorities, and it doesn’t take a genius to figure out who was really in possession of these surface-to-air missile systems – the Ukrainian military.

Official US Plan to Destroy Civilian Aircraft for Diplomatic Gain

The first official known plan to fake the destruction of a civilian aircraft was drafted by the US Pentagon in 1962. A former NSA analyst at Strategic Culture reports:

“The use of commercial passenger planes as false flag targets of opportunity for U.S. national security and intelligence planners is nothing new. The U.S. National Archives yielded an explosive formerly classified document some five months before the 9/11 attack in 2001. The document, “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba”, outlined for Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, a series of false flag attacks, code named OPERATION NORTHWOODS, which would be carried out by the United States on various targets but be blamed on the Fidel Castro government of Cuba. Dated March 13, 1962, the Top Secret NORTHWOODS document was prepared by America’s top covert Special Operations officer, General Edward Lansdale.”
“The NORTHWOODS plans called for the sinking of a boatload of Cuban refugees en route from Cuba to U.S. shores, blowing up an American ship in Cuban waters, and more importantly in light of the recent downing of Malaysian Airlines flight 17 over eastern Ukraine, faking a Cuban Air Force attack on a civilian jetliner.

Lansdale and his NORTHWOODS planners concluded that the U.S. invasion of Cuba would receive wide support as a result of an outraged public. The document states: “World opinion and the United Nations forum should be favorably affected by developing the international image of Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the Western Hemisphere.”
Most certainly, this blueprint by US intelligence is mirrored today in 2014, as the US and its NATO member allies (and media assets in tow) using totally synchronized messaging – dominated by wild speculation, hyperbole and hysteria characterizing the rebels in the east of Ukraine as terrorists, Russia as the enemy, and President Vladimir Putin as ‘the personification of evil’ for American and British media consumers.
The world can only pray, that the truth may prevail.